Post by bizenyaPost by liam67Bluedreams wrote >
Post by BluedreamsOn Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:39:05 -0800 (PST), liam67
Post by liam67Post by bizenyaPost by liam67Eh, no, I don't think so...
A team is as good as its weakest component.
Boyd plays for the Scottish Champions who just secured a point away
to their nearest chasers.
Perhaps Celtic will put in an offer for him?
True...Celtic do need a goal scorer....and Rangers can't afford to
give Boyd a new contract...maybe Celtic should put in a bid...
Nah, your better off selling your squad and replacing it with players
even more shite than the ones that left!!
"Rangers have not bought anyone in 18 months, were 30 million in debt.."
You still are over 30 Million in debt.
And the bank is running the club...how humiliating, for the once proud
peepul!!....
There are costs associated with being the world's most successful domestic
club team. Costs which would be offset if we weren't shackled by the
limitations of playing in little league. We had ideas above our station its
true, so we've amassed a bit of debt.
We'll just need to stick to being the most successful team in Scotland for
the time being - a task which seems to look a bit easier given the cracked
shamrock looming on the horizon.
;o)
I don't think the papers will be bringing out the cracked union jack
any time soon, so you're half right, that the cracked shamrock is more
likely to be on the horizon...
I suppose it's to be expected when most of your support comes
predominantly from immigrants and have a different culture from the
establishment....
Although, maybe you are not completely the establishment team. For
example, in what way does three and two score years ago fit into your
theory that you are "the most successful team in Scotland"? Or, in
other words, at current exchange rates, how many didy leagues are
worth one European Cup? ;)